Objective predictors of outcome in forensic mental health services—a systematic review
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
A systematic review of outcome measures used in forensic mental health research with consensus panel opinion.
OBJECTIVE To describe and assess outcome measures in forensic mental health research, through a structured review and a consensus panel. DATA SOURCES A search of eight electronic databases, including CINAHL, EMBASE and MEDLINE, was conducted for the period 1990-2006. REVIEW METHODS In the structured review, search and medical subject heading terms focused upon two factors: the use of a fore...
متن کاملPredictors of Mental Health Review Tribunal (MHRT) outcome in a forensic inpatient population: a prospective cohort study
BACKGROUND Previous studies have investigated factors associated with outcome at Mental Health Review Tribunals (MHRTs) in forensic psychiatric patients; however, dynamic variables such as treatment compliance and substance misuse have scarcely been examined, particularly in UK samples. We aimed to determine whether dynamic factors related to behaviour, cooperation with treatment, and activitie...
متن کاملPredictors of multidisciplinary treatment outcome in fibromyalgia:a systematic review.
PURPOSE To identify outcome predictors for multidisciplinary treatment in patients with chronic widespread pain (CWP) or fibromyalgia (FM). METHODS A systematic literature search in PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and Pedro. Selection criteria included: age over 18; diagnosis CWP or FM; multidisciplinary treatment; longitudinal study design; original research report. Outcom...
متن کاملOutcomes research in mental health. Systematic review.
BACKGROUND Outcomes research involves the secondary analysis of data collected routinely by clinical services, in order to judge the effectiveness of interventions and policy initiatives. It permits the study of large databases of patients who are representative of 'real world' practice. However, there are potential problems with this observational design. AIMS To establish the strengths and ...
متن کاملPeer review to ensure quality in forensic mental health publication.
Peer reviewers have been called the gatekeepers of science. For journal publications in forensic psychiatry, as well as other disciplines, the purposes of peer review are to assist in the selection of manuscripts to publish, improve the quality of manuscripts before their publication, and promote the fairness of the process. In this article, we examine, in particular, characteristics of high-qu...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: CNS Spectrums
سال: 2016
ISSN: 1092-8529,2165-6509
DOI: 10.1017/s1092852915000723